Continuity
I stay familiar with the codebase, so new tasks start with the existing project context.
Ongoing technical support for websites and products: development, SEO improvements, monitoring, maintenance, and iterative delivery.
Continuity
I stay familiar with the codebase, so new tasks start with the existing project context.
Flexibility
Development, technical SEO, and maintenance can share one backlog.
Visibility
Work is reviewed regularly with clear next priorities.
Continuous collaboration fits products that need recurring improvements, maintenance, technical SEO, and a reliable delivery rhythm rather than isolated interventions.
A shared view of improvements and operational issues.
Regular implementation cycles with visible progress.
A clear follow-up after completed work.
Feature work, bugs, performance and technical SEO can be planned together, with priorities agreed for the available time.
I prepare changes for review and use the agreed testing and publication process. Availability and urgent work are discussed explicitly.
Ongoing work should improve documentation and ownership, not make the product dependent on one person. The team keeps access to the code and decisions.
Choose this model when a website or product already exists and requires steady, accountable improvement.
We agree the goal, scope and expected output before starting. Each stage ends with something you can review, use or approve.
We review the system, team needs and expected availability. Scope, budget, reporting, billing and urgent requests are discussed before starting.
Outcome: Clear rules for communication, prioritisation and billing.
I inspect the repository, dependencies and deployment setup, along with current bugs and technical risks.
Outcome: A practical starting backlog and access checklist.
We order tasks by business value, risk and effort, matching the plan to the available allocation.
Outcome: An agreed set of tasks with acceptance criteria.
I prepare changes for review, check the affected journeys and follow the agreed release process with your team.
Outcome: Reviewed changes delivered in a predictable rhythm.
We review completed work, monitoring findings and the next priorities. We adjust the scope when the product or available budget changes.
Outcome: A work summary and a clear plan for the next period.
Scope, flexibility, and work with existing projects.
Yes. I start with a review of the codebase, dependencies, access and deployment process. We agree immediate risks and priorities before taking on a recurring backlog. Documentation and a working test environment help make the transition predictable.
Hourly work suits irregular tasks or uncertain scope. A retainer provides an agreed monthly allocation and a regular review and delivery rhythm. We define available time, billing, prioritisation and how changes to the scope are handled before starting.
Yes. Development, performance, technical SEO and measurement improvements can share the same backlog. We agree which areas are covered and review the evidence behind each priority. This does not imply that every marketing activity is included.
It depends on the backlog and pace of change. Maintenance may need a smaller allocation, while active product development benefits from a weekly rhythm. I propose a starting scope after reviewing the project; there is no universal number that fits every website.
Yes. We agree ownership, review and release responsibilities, communication channels and access. Urgent issues and expected availability are discussed explicitly. Ongoing collaboration does not automatically mean round-the-clock incident response.
I do not assume a long annual commitment. What matters is clear scope, availability, priorities and a billing rhythm that fits the project. Changes, handover and the end of collaboration should follow the terms agreed before work begins.
Compare the scope with these services, or explore selected client projects and my role in them.